They like to say if you’re not part of the solution, then you’re part of the problem.
I’m okay with that and they can go fuck themselves.
Who the hell do they think they are anyway? What qualifies them to decide who’s part of the solution and who’s part of the problem? I mean, are they scientists? Are they philosophers? Did they engineer the problem just to determine who is a part of which variable? The data is murky at best.
See, I think, the problem is them. And they need to shut the fuck up.
Advertisements
